Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 OS. IPhone 13 Pro Max's construction is newer and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 4a's, but it's also incredibly heavier.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display, a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 and a bigger screen.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography. The Google Pixel 4a's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max one, both of them have equal internal storage.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 39% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4a, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.