Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's general score of 87.5. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is way heavier than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's a bit thinner and newer. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little greater pixels density, a bit bigger screen and a higher 1284 x 2778 resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a more mega pixels camera.
IPhone 13 Pro Max and Google Pixel 4a 5G count with really similar memory capacity for apps and games, both have the same internal storage. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.