Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is a bit better than Google Pixel 5, getting a 93.2 score against 89. Although the iPhone 13 Pro Max is notably heavier than the Google Pixel 5, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performance than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a quite larger display, a better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a just a bit higher display density. Google Pixel 5 and iPhone 13 Pro Max both feature very similar memory to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. Google Pixel 5 takes a bit better videos and photos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a more mega pixels camera in the back.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 5. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 5, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.