Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, with a score of 93.2 against 75.8. IPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola Moto Z Force counts with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is much newer, but way heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores , more RAM and a 64-bits processor. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Motorola Moto Z Force both feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Moto Z Force features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.