Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a overall score of 93.2 against 77.4. The iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is notably newer, but much thicker and much heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a larger amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a slightly better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse resolution of 1284 x 2778px, it also counts with a bigger screen. Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution camera, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4352mAh battery size against 2730mAh.
IPhone 13 Pro Max is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.