Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a 93.2 score against 77.4. IPhone 13 Pro Max is a much newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play, but it is extremely heavier and extremely thicker. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px, a just a bit greater pixel density and a bigger screen.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a quite better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a larger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a very superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 45% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.