Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), getting a general score of 93.2 against 87. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola razr (2020) counts with Android 11 operating system. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is newer and a little thinner than Motorola razr (2020)'s, although it is also much heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a greater performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 2 lesser cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a much better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a better 1284 x 2778 resolution, a bit larger display and a just a little greater pixels number in each display inch.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4352mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.