Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 457 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's general score of 77. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A20s works with Android 11 operating system. Although the iPhone 13 Pro Max is heavier than Samsung Galaxy A20s, it's just a little thinner and newer.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a much better performing processor than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a lot better display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a way higher screen pixel density, a bit larger screen and a lot higher 1284 x 2778 resolution.
The Galaxy A20s features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone 13 Pro Max captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a little better battery duration than Galaxy A20s, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.