Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.71 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 operating system. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is way older and heavier than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a display that is very similar to the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max one, although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a just a bit worse pixel density, a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures better videos and photos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 15 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.