Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Galaxy A5 (2017), having a global score of 93.2 against 75.8. The iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it's a lot heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger screen, a just a little better number of pixels in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a higher amount of RAM.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.