Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than Samsung Galaxy A50, having a 93.2 score against 83.8. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a notably heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A50, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite better performance than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and more RAM memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit better number of pixels per display inch, a little bigger screen and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a lot higher 25 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. IPhone 13 Pro Max features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A50, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.