Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A52's global score of 90.7. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy A52 were only released 6 months apart, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max body is much heavier but also just a bit thinner.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a just a bit higher display density, a quite better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a quite bigger display. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a quite better performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Galaxy A52 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 takes greater photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy A52 has a little better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.