Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, getting a score of 93.2 against 91.3. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G were released with only 6 months difference, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max body is heavier but a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G comes with Android 12 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite greater pixel count in each inch in the display, a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1284 x 2778px. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.