Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a little bit better than Galaxy A52s, getting a 93.2 score against 91.1. IPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A52s comes with Android 11 operating system. Although iPhone 13 Pro Max and Galaxy A52s were only released 1 months apart, the iPhone 13 Pro Max body is just a bit thinner but much heavier.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher pixel count per inch of display and a slightly better 1284 x 2778 resolution. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a quite better processing power than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a greater camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A52s features a bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.