Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is way better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a extremely heavier cellphone than Galaxy A6, but both of them have the same thickness. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and 3 GB more RAM.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1284 x 2778px resolution, a much greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a larger screen. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.