Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Galaxy A70, with a general score of 93.2 against 76.9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's body is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but extremely heavier than the Galaxy A70. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a little greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1284 x 2778px resolution.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has better video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos. The Galaxy A70 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A70, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.