Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, having a overall score of 93.2 against 88.1. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy F62 works with Android 11 operating system. Although the iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy F62 were released only 7 months apart, the iPhone 13 Pro Max body is just a little heavier but also thinner than the Samsung Galaxy F62.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a greater number of cores and a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1284 x 2778px.
Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.