Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a bit better than iPhone 13 Pro Max's score of 93.2. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and somewhat heavier than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, it's construction is still a little thinner. Galaxy Fold counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1284 x 2778px. Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max. Both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a battery duration that is very similar to iPhone 13 Pro Max's battery life, although the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the iPhone 13 Pro Max. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and buy the iPhone 13 Pro Max, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.