Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M40's overall score of 85. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro Max is noticeably heavier than Samsung Galaxy M40, it's a little thinner and also way newer. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy M40 works with Android 10 operating system.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite better processing power than Galaxy M40, because although it has less cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a quite better count of pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger screen and a better 1284 x 2778 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M40 features a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 32 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy M40 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M40 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has longer battery life than Galaxy M40, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.