Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M51, having a overall score of 93.2 against 87.7. Although the iPhone 13 Pro Max is heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M51, it's thinner and newer. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy M51 works with Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a little higher pixel density and a higher 1284 x 2778px resolution. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performing processor than Galaxy M51, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy M51 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.