Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 general score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but a lot heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and 2 GB more RAM.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1284 x 2778, it also counts with a larger display. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 36 percent more battery size. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a 12 megapixels camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a bigger aperture and faster video frame rate.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max costs a lot more money than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.