Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S10e's global score of 86.3. IPhone 13 Pro Max's body is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner, but way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S10e. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit better display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a higher 1284 x 2778 resolution, a larger display and a just a little better pixels count in each display inch.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max. They have a same resolution back facing camera, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S10e. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy S10e, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.