Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-24 | -- |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 10.71 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Galaxy S6 Active, getting a 93.2 score against 80.9. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S6 Active comes with Android 5.0 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit and an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 64 bits CPU, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with more RAM.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a more vivid display than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher screen density. IPhone 13 Pro Max has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a way worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S6 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.