Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Galaxy S7, with a 93.2 score against 79.5. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is notably newer and a bit thinner than Galaxy S7's, but it's incredibly heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM memory, a 64-bits CPU and a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy S7 counts with a little bit better screen than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560. IPhone 13 Pro Max features more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a camera with a 12 MP and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light situations.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.