Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a 93.2 score against 75.8. IPhone 13 Pro Max is a way newer and way thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it is also way heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 2 more cores, a larger amount of RAM and a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy S7 Active has a slightly better display than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution. IPhone 13 Pro Max captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a larger aperture and higher video frame rate.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 9% more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.