Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a 93.2 score against 81. IPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro works with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro Max design is newer and a lot thinner, but a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a little higher screen pixel density.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.