Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. Even though iPhone 13 Pro Max is newer than the Galaxy Z Flip, it's just a little bit thicker and much heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1284 x 2778. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater storage to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4352mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip shoots a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.