Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| iOS 15.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a 93.2 score against 79. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is extremely newer and extremely thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it's much heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Xperia XZ2 Compact works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a superior processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a larger amount of RAM. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit sharper screen than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 400 GB. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4352mAh battery size against 2870mAh.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.