Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 global score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 13 Pro Max's construction is just a little bit thinner but notably heavier than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and both of them were released with only 4 months difference.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a little bit higher screen density and a little higher 1284 x 2778px resolution. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performing processor than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features as much storage capacity to install games and applications as iPhone 13 Pro Max, both have the same internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.