Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Google Pixel, getting a overall score of 93.3 against 80.2. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Google Pixel, but it's also notably heavier. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better performing CPU than Google Pixel, because it has more cores, more RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a little bit higher pixel density, a better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a larger display. Google Pixel and iPhone 13 Pro have similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a less MP camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.