Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is better than Google Pixel 2 XL, with a overall score of 93.3 against 82.5. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is heavier than the Google Pixel 2 XL, it's a little bit thinner and also a lot newer. The iPhone 13 Pro has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Google Pixel 2 XL's storage for games and applications is just as good as Apple iPhone 13 Pro's one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better performing CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a larger amount of RAM.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography. Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 2 XL, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.