Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is better than the Google Pixel 3, having a 93.3 score against 80. Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a a lot newer and a bit thinner phone than Google Pixel 3, although it is a lot heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532px, a bit bigger screen and a just a little higher pixels density. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
IPhone 13 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.