Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a 93.3 score against 78.8. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 3a counts with Android 11 OS. Even though iPhone 13 Pro is noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 3a, it's a bit thinner and notably newer. IPhone 13 Pro has a much better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a quite superior processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM. The iPhone 13 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a camera with lesser MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.