Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has an overall score of 93.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 3a XL works with Android 11 OS. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is heavier than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it's a bit thinner and much newer.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a much better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a bit greater pixels density. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with longer battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.