Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than Google Pixel 4a, with a 93.3 score against 82.9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, although it is also extremely heavier.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a much better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532, a quite greater screen density and a little larger screen. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone 13 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lesser MP back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos. Google Pixel 4a's memory for apps and games is very similar to the Apple iPhone 13 Pro one, they have exactly the same internal memory.
The Google Pixel 4a features just a little bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 1% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4a, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.