Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a general score of 93.3 against 87.5. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is heavier than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a much better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better count of pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1170 x 2532px resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with as much memory to install games and applications as iPhone 13 Pro, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 2 lesser cores (but faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a camera in the back with more megapixels.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with greater battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 26 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4a 5G, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.