Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 5's general score of 89. Although iPhone 13 Pro is heavier than the Google Pixel 5, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a more powerful processor than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 2 less cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little larger display and a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution. Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 5's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the iPhone 13 Pro one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 5 has greater battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 32 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 5. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 5, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.