Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is slightly better than the LG V60 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 93.3 against 87.6. IPhone 13 Pro is a newer device, and it is also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ. The iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while LG V60 ThinQ comes with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a greater hardware performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has less cores (although they are faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel number per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px. The LG V60 ThinQ captures slightly better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V60 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V60 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.