Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is much better than Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Even though iPhone 13 Pro is noticeably newer than the Moto Z Force, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a quite inferior pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display. Moto Z Force features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory, more processing cores and a 64-bits processing unit. The Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Moto Z Force counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in iPhone 13 Pro, because although the Moto Z Force has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in poorly lited situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot higher 21 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.