Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), getting a global score of 93.3 against 87. Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 operating system. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro body is newer and a little bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Motorola razr (2020).
The iPhone 13 Pro has a superior CPU than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less processing cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the iPhone 13 Pro is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.