Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's score of 82.1. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12 OS. The iPhone 13 Pro body is somewhat thinner but just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and both of them were only released 2 months apart.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and more RAM. The iPhone 13 Pro has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a way higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.