Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.71 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is better than the Galaxy A25 5G, getting a 93.3 score against 79.9. The iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A25 5G counts with Android 14 OS. IPhone 13 Pro is a way older and just a little heavier cellphone than Galaxy A25 5G, but Apple managed to build it a little thinner anyway.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little brighter display, a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (although faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 62% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G has a superior camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.