Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.71 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having a overall score of 93.3 against 79.4. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G works with Android 14 OS. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is older than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is a little thinner and a little lighter.
IPhone 13 Pro has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more brightness, a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A35 5G has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as iPhone 13 Pro, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.