Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A50's overall score of 83.8. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A50, but it's somewhat heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro has a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display density and a quite better 1170 x 2532px resolution. Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 has better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots clearer photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.