Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy A52 5G's 91.3 general score. Although iPhone 13 Pro and Galaxy A52 5G were only released 6 months apart, the iPhone 13 Pro body is a bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A52 5G. IPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A52 5G counts with Android 12 OS.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a bit better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 45% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.