Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy A52s's 91.1 global score. IPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A52s counts with Android 11 operating system. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro and Galaxy A52s were released with only 1 months difference, iPhone 13 Pro's body is just a bit thinner but just a little bit heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better processor than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 13 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a bit higher display pixel density.
Galaxy A52s features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.