Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.71 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is much better than Galaxy A6's general score of 75.8. The iPhone 13 Pro is a notably heavier device than the Galaxy A6, but they have the same thickness. The iPhone 13 Pro has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images. IPhone 13 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.