Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than the Galaxy A70, getting a 93.3 score against 76.9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's body is notably newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy A70. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A70 has a much greater storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 13 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and higher 60 fps video frame rate. The Galaxy A70 has a very superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A70, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.