Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), having a 93.3 score against 85.2. The iPhone 13 Pro body is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy A9 (2018). The iPhone 13 Pro features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 2 less cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1170 x 2532. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A9 (2018) captures clearer videos and photos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a lot more MP camera. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has greater battery life than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.