Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 457 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy F62, with a score of 93.3 against 88.1. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction is thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy F62, even when both of them were released with only 7 months difference. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy F62 comes with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a 64-bit CPU and a greater number of cores. IPhone 13 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a much brighter display.
Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 126 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.